Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 31980

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : CC01 - CC05 Full Version

Comparison of Levels of Telomerase, Oxidative Stress, Adiponectin, Leptin, and Interleukin-6 in First Degree Relatives of Diabetics, Prediabetics, and Diabetics: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64107.18512
Rajathi Rajendran, Vivek Kumar Sharma, Kolar Vishwanath Vinod, Ramesh Ananthakrishnan, Hanumanthappa Nandeesha, Senthil Kumar Subramanian

1. Tutor, Department of Physiology, AIIMS, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Physiology, AIIMS, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. 3. Additional Professor, Department of Medicine, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India. 4. Additional Professor, Department of Radiology, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India. 5. Additional Professor, Department of Biochemistry, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India. 6. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, AIIMS, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rajathi Rajendran,
Tutor, Department of Physiology, Medical College, Block 2, AIIMS, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: raji.dec24@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid beta-cell senescence caused by telomere shortening is associated with type 2 diabetes. Hence, studying telomere dynamics in prediabetic stages or First Degree Relatives of Diabetics (FDRD) is crucial. Telomere attrition is influenced by oxidative stress, which is prevalent in diabetics, prediabetics, and FDRD due to dyslipidaemia. The relationship between telomerase activity and glycaemic control, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, dyslipidaemia, adipocytokines, and inflammatory markers remains unclear and requires further investigation.

Aim: To assess and compare telomerase levels, oxidative stress (malondialdehyde), adipocytokines (leptin, adiponectin, and Interleukin-6 (IL-6), lipid profiles, and Body Fat Percentage (BF%) across the glycaemic spectrum in the Indian population.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Physiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, from 2016 to 2018, involving four groups: Group I (control group, non diabetic, healthy, non FDRD, n=63), Group II (FDRD, non diabetic, n=63), Group III (prediabetics, n=63), and Group IV (diabetics, n=63). Participants aged 30-50 years, matched for age and gender, were recruited. Anthropometric variables, cardiovascular parameters, telomerase levels, Malondialdehyde (MDA), adiponectin, leptin, IL-6, and lipid profiles were assessed. Mean differences were analysed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis test, while Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to assess the correlation between telomerase levels, glucose concentration, and BF%.

Results: An increasing trend in circulating telomerase levels, lipid profiles, and BF% was observed across the glycaemic spectrum. Circulating leptin concentrations did not differ between the groups. However, there was a decrease in circulating adiponectin concentration as the glycaemic status progressed. Increased MDA levels were observed only in the diabetics group. Telomerase levels showed a significant association with circulating glucose concentration (fasting and postprandial) and BF%.

Conclusion: The circulating telomerase level increased along the glycaemic spectrum (non FDRD< FDRD< Prediabetics < Diabetics). The major finding was that telomerase level increases even in normoglycaemic FDRD. Oxidative and inflammatory parameters did not significantly differ in FDRD compared to non FDRD individuals. Notably, adiponectin, Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL), and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) were the parameters that showed changes in FDRD.

Keywords

Adipocytokines, Diabetes mellitus, Prediabetic state, Type 2 diabetes

Approximately 74 million people in India have diabetes, and it is projected to increase to 125 million by 2045 (1). Engaging in regular physical activity, avoiding smoking, maintaining a healthy diet, and achieving a normal body weight can help delay the onset of diabetes (2). However, age is a non modifiable risk factor for diabetes, and the prevalence of diabetes increases with age regardless of any modifiable risk factors (3). Furthermore, diabetes is considered to cause accelerated ageing (4).

Telomeres, which are repetitive nucleotide sequences at the end of human chromosomes, shorten with each cell division, contributing to genomic stability (5). Therefore, telomere length can indicate the age of a cell. The length of telomeres depends on the enzyme telomerase (6), which can replace lost telomere sequences during replication (7). Consequently, shortened telomeres can result from a relative or absolute decrease in telomerase activity. Additionally, short telomeres have been associated with cardiovascular risk (8). Telomerase activity is now recognised as an important cardio-metabolic biomarker, linked to the progression of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and its complications (9). Decreased telomere length has even been reported in individuals with prediabetes [9,10]. However, the presence or absence of telomere attrition in FDRD is still a topic of debate (11),(12). A recent study suggests that the rapid progression of beta-cell senescence, due to accelerated telomere shortening, is a possible cause of type 2 diabetes (13), as short telomeres have been shown to interfere with B cell signaling and lifespan (14). Hence, telomere attrition or disturbances in telomerase activity could have begun before the onset of diabetes, highlighting the importance of studying these parameters in the prediabetic stage and in FDRD.

Although telomere length and the rate of telomere shortening are genetically programmed, they are also influenced by external factors (15). Specifically, oxidative stress contributes to telomere shortening in T2DM (16),(17). Individuals with diabetes, prediabetes (18), and FDRD (19) often have dyslipidaemia, which in itself can cause oxidative stress. Adipocytokines (adiponectin and leptin) (20) and inflammation are also implicated in the pathophysiology of diabetes. However, the association between telomerase activity and glycaemic control, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, dyslipidaemia, adipocytokines, and inflammatory markers is not yet clear (9),(21) or remains to be studied. Given these factors, the present study was designed to assess and compare telomerase levels, oxidative stress MDA, adipocytokines (leptin, adiponectin, and IL-6), lipid profile, and BF% across the glycaemic spectrum in the Indian population.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India from June 2016 to November 2018. The data presented here are from a larger study conducted as a Ph.D. project. The publications of other parts of the project can be found elsewhere [22-24]. The study was approved by the Institute Scientific Advisory Committee (JSAC/34/7/2016) and the Institutional Human Ethics Committee (No.JIP/IEC2016/28/939).

Inclusion criteria: Individuals of either gender, aged between 30 and 50 years, who were of native Indian origin and residing in and around Puducherry, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Participants with random blood sugar levels ≥200 mg/dL, or those with prehypertension/hypertension, were excluded and advised to visit a nearby hospital for further medical support. Smokers, pregnant women, morbidly obese participants, and participants with any known organic disorders were also excluded from the study.

Procedure

The study consisted of four groups to cover the glycaemic spectrum: Group I - normoglycaemic healthy volunteer non FDRD, Group II - normoglycaemic FDRD (either parent or sibling, not less than a year), Group III - prediabetics, and Group IV - diabetics. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria (25) were used to define the population for prediabetics and diabetics groups. Subject recruitment was mainly conducted during the prediabetes screening camp held in and around Puducherry (n=1,177). Participants were requested to report after an overnight fasting period. After obtaining consent for the screening camp, a family history of diabetes along with other relevant personal and medical history was collected. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using an automatic BP monitor (Model: CH432B, Citizen Systems Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) following the JNC-7 recommendations (26). Capillary blood sugar levels were measured using a blood glucometer (OneTouch Verio Flex® Blood Glucose Monitoring System). Recruitment for the diabetic group mainly took place in the Medicine Outpatient Department (OPD) at JIPMER, Puducherry. Diabetics on insulin therapy or with any known complications were excluded. People accompanying diabetics in the Medicine OPD were also considered for enrollment as participants under the FDRD or prediabetics group.

The study was explained to all the individuals considered for participation, and their written consent to participate was obtained. They were instructed to report to the Physiology department after an overnight fasting period, around 8 AM. Upon arrival, participants were given 10 minutes of rest in a sitting position, and baseline blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were manually recorded. Five milliliters of blood were collected from the antecubital vein for biochemical measurements, and an additional 3 milliliters were collected two hours after consuming 75 g of oral glucose. Following that, basic anthropometric measurements were made and BF% was measured using bioimpedance analysis. The assignment of participants to each group was based on the blood sugar levels (fasting and postprandial) obtained in lab sample, and family history of diabetes as explained in study population section. Total 252 participants were recruited, 63 in each group. The sample size was calculated based on a vascular parameter ET-1 , which is described elsewhere (22).

Parameters measured: The anthropometric variables (height, weight, and Body Mass Index (BMI) which were measured by certified personnel using standardised stadiometers and weighing scales recommended by the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). BMI was calculated using the Quetelet index (27). Heart rate and BP were measured for all participants. BP was recorded using a BP mercury sphygmomanometer (Model: Diamond Deluxe: BPMR 120, Industrial Electronic and Allied Products, Pune, Maharashtra, India), with participants in a seated position after sufficient rest, in the right arm. Two BP readings were taken with a five-minute interval by the same person. Pulse rate was manually recorded from the right radial artery. Body composition analysis was performed using bioelectrical impedance analysis, which involves measuring bioelectrical resistive impedance (28). BF% was determined using the software connected to the Quadscan 4000 bodystat machine (Model QuadScan 4000®, Isle of Man, United Kingdom).

For biochemical analysis, the collected blood samples were centrifuged, and the serum was separated and stored at -80°C for further analysis. Blood glucose levels were analysed using the glucose oxidase-peroxidase (GOD-POD) method using an automated Olympus AU 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyser (USA). Telomerase activity was measured using an Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA) kit (Elabscience Biotechnology) based on the sandwich-ELISA principle. MDA levels were quantified using the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances assay (QuantiChromTM TBARS Assay Kit, DTBA-100, Bioassay Systems, USA) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Adiponectin (RayBio Human Acrp30 ELISA kit, Norcross, GA), leptin (DBC Diagnostics Biochem Canada Inc., Canada), and IL-6 (Quantikine, R&D Systems, USA) concentrations were measured using ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Lipid profiles were analysed using the automated Olympus AU 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyser (USA). Total cholesterol was measured using an enzymatic colorimetric method (Diagnostic kit from Beacon Diagnostics, Navsari, India). High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) was directly measured using an enzymatic colorimetric method (Diagnostic kit from Agappe Diagnostics, Kerala, India). Triglycerides (TG) were quantified using an enzymatic colorimetric method (Diagnostic kit from Beacon Diagnostics, Navsari, India). LDL cholesterol and Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) levels were calculated using Friedewald’s formula (29).

Statistical Analysis

Telomerase, MDA, adiponectin, leptin, IL-6, and TNF-α did not follow a normal distribution and were expressed as median (interquartile range). A comparison of these variables across groups was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test for post-hoc analysis. Lipid profile and its derived parameters followed a normal distribution and were expressed as mean and standard deviations (SD). The mean difference was calculated using one-way ANOVA, followed by a post-hoc test. The correlation coefficient was determined using the Spearman correlation test. The analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Data on age, gender, BMI, heart rate, BP, fasting insulin, and insulin resistance are presented elsewhere. Authors have summarised the results, and kindly request readers to refer to the previous publications for further details.

(Table/Fig 1) shows a comparison of telomerase, MDA, adiponectin, leptin, IL-6, and TNF-alpha across the glycaemic spectrum. Telomerase levels increase along the glycaemic spectrum. On post-hoc analysis, there was no significant difference in telomerase levels between non FDRD and FDRD, FDRD and prediabetes, and prediabetics and diabetics. Compared to non FDRD, prediabetics and diabetics had higher telomerase levels. Compared to FDRD, diabetics (p=0.037) had higher telomerase levels.

MDA was significantly higher in diabetics compared to non FDRD, FDRD, and prediabetics. Adiponectin was significantly lower in FDRD, prediabetics, and diabetics compared to the control group. Leptin remains comparable along the glycaemic spectrum. IL-6 was significantly higher in the diabetics group compared to all the other groups, while it is comparable among the other groups. TNF-alpha increases along the glycaemic spectrum. Prediabetics and diabetics have significantly higher TNF-alpha levels than the control and FDRD groups. Diabetics have significantly higher TNF-alpha levels than prediabetics.

(Table/Fig 2) shows a comparison of lipid profiles across the glycaemic spectrum. Lipid profile values (TC, TG, LDL, VLDL, TC/HDL, TG/HDL, AIP) increase along the glycaemic spectrum, while HDL values decrease along the glycaemic spectrum. Prediabetics and diabetics have significantly higher lipid profile values (except HDL, which was significantly lower) compared to the non FDRD group. Diabetics had significantly higher lipid profile values (except HDL, which was comparable) compared to FDRD.

(Table/Fig 3) shows the correlation between telomerase and glucose and BF%. There was a significant positive association between telomerase levels and fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, and BF%.

Discussion

The objective of this study was to assess telomerase levels and associated parameters across the glycaemic spectrum. The major finding of this study was an increase in circulating telomerase levels along the glycaemic spectrum (non FDRD < FDRD < Prediabetics < Diabetics).

The groups were comparable based on age (p=0.132), gender (p=0.456), and BMI (p=0.495). BF% increased significantly in the three groups compared to group I. However, all the other three groups were comparable based on BF% (24). Heart rate increases along the glycaemic spectrum as we move from group I to group IV. Post-hoc analysis showed that the heart rate was significantly higher in group II, III, and IV compared to group I, while it was comparable between group II, III, and IV. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were comparable along the glycaemic spectrum. Fasting insulin and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) increase along the glycaemic spectrum. There is no significant difference in fasting insulin level and insulin resistance between non FDRD vs FDRD and prediabetics vs diabetics. However, fasting insulin levels and insulin resistance in prediabetics and diabetics are significantly higher compared to non FDRD and FDRD (23).

Telomere length is influenced by hereditary factors (30),(31), with oxidative stress considered the primary cause of telomere shortening. Additionally, various factors such as higher BF% (32), dyslipidaemia (33), high insulin levels (34), insulin resistance (35), increased inflammatory markers (36), decreased adiponectin levels (37), and high leptin levels (38) have been associated with reduced telomere length.

Diabetes is known to accelerate the ageing process (4) and induce a reduction in DNA unwinding rate (39), decrease Na+K+ATPase activity, increase collagen cross-linking, and oxidative damage (40). Oxidative stress has been shown to accelerate telomere attrition during DNA replication (41). Oxidative stress-induced single-strand breaks in telomeres can lead to faster telomere loss by stalling the replication fork (42),(43),(44). It can be hypothesised that decreased telomere length due to oxidative damage may trigger a compensatory increase in telomerase levels to limit telomere shortening for genomic stability.

Similar observations have been made in rats, where chronic stress increased telomerase levels (45). A study on depressed individuals has reported shorter telomere length accompanied by a compensatory increase in telomerase activity (46). Therefore, increased telomerase activity could be considered an indirect measure of decreasing telomere length (46). In this study, it was observed that telomerase levels showed a gradual increase across the glycaemic spectrum, with significant positive correlations between fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels and telomerase levels. However, studies on diabetic subjects with angiopathy or foot ulcer have shown decreased telomerase activity (47),(48). This discrepancy may be attributed to the exclusion of diabetics with complications and insulin therapy in this study. It can be proposed that telomerase levels increase as a compensatory mechanism in the early stages of diabetes and decrease in the late stages, leading to diabetic complications.

Based on the findings of this study, the increase in telomerase levels in diabetics can be attributed to higher oxidative stress, BF%, insulin levels, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, and low adiponectin levels observed in this group. However, the increase in telomerase levels in prediabetics could not be solely explained by oxidative stress levels, as MDA levels were not significantly different from the control group. It has been suggested that rapid T cell proliferation during conditions such as exacerbation of psoriasis or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) can lead to short telomeres, overriding the compensatory increase in telomerase levels (49),(50). Hyperglycaemia-induced T cell activation and proliferation, mediated by oxidative stress (51), could potentially contribute to telomere shortening in prediabetics. Furthermore, higher insulin levels, insulin resistance, BF%, dyslipidaemia, and lower adiponectin levels observed in the prediabetics group could lead to telomere shortening through mechanisms other than oxidative stress.

Oxidative stress levels, glucose levels, insulin levels, and insulin sensitivity were comparable between the non FDRD control group and the FDRD group. With the exception of higher LDL and lower HDL, the lipid profiles of both groups were similar. The only significant difference from the control group was lower adiponectin levels and higher BF% in the FDRD group. These observations do not fully explain the non significantly higher telomerase levels in the FDRD group. Maternal stress during pregnancy has been associated with shorter telomere length in offspring of diabetic mothers (52). Therefore, it can be hypothesised that FDRD individuals may have initially had shorter telomere length, and T cell dysregulation and proliferation in later life may have accelerated telomere attrition. However, this hypothesis does not apply to all FDRDs, prompting us to consider an alternate hypothesis proposed by Yi HS et al., (53). They suggest that senescent T cells may serve as precursors of abnormal glucose homeostasis rather than being a result of hyperglycaemia. They observed increased CD4 T cell proliferation enhancing inflammation through TNF-α in prediabetic subjects, which aligns with this study’s observation of increased inflammatory markers in prediabetics (53). It can be noted that inflammatory markers and telomerase levels show an increasing trend across the glycaemic spectrum in this study. Therefore, it can be proposed that senescence in T cells (indicated by increased telomerase levels) precedes abnormal glucose homeostasis in this study as well.

Limitation(s)

One limitation of this study is that telomere length was not measured directly. Additionally, T cell function was not measured, and the sub-classification of T cells with reduced telomere length was not studied, which would be the logical extension of this study.

Conclusion

The circulating telomerase level increased along the glycaemic spectrum (non FDRD < FDRD < Prediabetics < Diabetics). The major finding was that telomerase levels increase even in normoglycaemic FDRD. Oxidative parameters (MDA) and inflammatory parameters (IL6, Leptin) were not altered in FDRD compared to non FDRD. Adiponectin, TNF-α, LDL, and HDL were the parameters that showed changes in FDRD. This necessitates revisiting various parameters that contribute to the development of diabetes to identify an earlier marker of derangement.

References

1.
Diabetesatlas.org. 2022. India diabetes report 2000-2045. [online] Available at: < https://diabetesatlas.org/data/en/country/93/in.html> [Accessed 2 April 2022].
2.
Global report on diabetes [Internet]. Who.int. 2022 [cited 2 April 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565257.
3.
Caspersen CJ, Thomas GD, Boseman LA, Beckles GL, Albright AL. Aging, diabetes, and the public health system in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(8):1482-97. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Morley JE. Diabetes and aging: Epidemiologic overview. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2008;24(3):395-405. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Blackburn EH. Structure and function of telomeres. Nature. 1991;350(6319):569-73. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Shay JW, Wright WE. Hallmarks of telomeres in ageing research. J Pathol. 2007;211(2):114-23. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Gavory G, Farrow M, Balasubramanian S. Minimum length requirement of the alignment domain of human telomerase RNA to sustain catalytic activity in vitro. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002;30(20):4470-80. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
D’Mello MJ, Ross SA, Briel M, Anand SS, Gerstein H, Pare G. Association between shortened leukocyte telomere length and cardiometabolic outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics. 2015;8(1):82-90. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Balasubramanyam M, Adaikalakoteswari A, Monickaraj SF, Mohan V. Telomere shortening & metabolic/vascular diseases. IJMR. 2007;125(3):441-50.
10.
Wang M, Li Y, Li S, Lv J. Endothelial dysfunction and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:851941. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Caballero AE, Arora S, Saouaf R, Lim SC, Smakowski P, Park JY, et al. Microvascular and macrovascular reactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 1999;48(9):1856-62. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Ostergård T, Nyholm B, Hansen TK, Rasmussen LM, Ingerslev J, Sørensen KE, et. Endothelial function and biochemical vascular markers in first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetic patients: The effect of exercise training. Metabolism. 2006;55(11):1508-15. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Porte D Jr, Kahn SE. Beta-cell dysfunction and failure in type 2 diabetes: Potential mechanisms. Diabetes. 2001;50(Suppl 1):S160-63. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Guo N, Parry EM, Li LS, Kembou F, Lauder N, Hussain MA, et al. Short telomeres compromise β-cell signaling and survival. PloS one. 2011;6(3):e17858-e. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Aviv A. Telomeres and human aging: Facts and fibs. Science of aging knowledge environment: SAGE KE. 2004;2004(51):pe43. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Turnpenny PD. Emery’s Elements of Medical Genetics. 15th ed: Elsevier; 2017.
17.
Murillo-Ortiz B, Albarran-Tamayo F, Arenas-Aranda D, Benitez-Bribiesca L, Malacara-Hernandez JM, Martinez-Garza S, et al. Telomere length and type 2 diabetes in males, a premature aging syndrome. The Aging Male. 2012;15(1):54-58. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Al Amri T, Bahijri S, Al-Raddadi R, Ajabnoor G, Al Ahmadi J, Jambi H, et al. The association between pre-diabetes and dyslipidemia among attendants of primary care health centers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:2735-43. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Purnamasari D, Aulia R, Abdaly MS, Hazim A. Hypercholesterolemia as the first manifestation of metabolic abnormalities in normoglycaemic young adult male with family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13(2):969-74. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Shimomura I, Funahashi T, Takahashi M, Maeda K, Kotani K, Nakamura T, et al. Enhanced expression of PAI-1 in visceral fat: Possible contributor to vascular disease in obesity. Nat Med. 1996;2(7):800-03. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Sampson MJ, Winterbone MS, Hughes JC, Dozio N, Hughes DA. Monocyte telomere shortening and oxidative DNA damage in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(2):283-89. [crossref]
22.
Rajendran R, Sharma VK, Nandeesha H, Ananthakrishnan R, Vinod KV, Subramanian SK. Assessment of vascular function in complete glycaemic spectrum. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2021;43(5):436-42.[crossref][PubMed]
23.
Rajendran R, Sharma VK, Vinod KV, Ananthakrishnan R, Nandeesha H, Subramanian SK. Comparison of cardiac autonomic function across complete glycaemic spectrum. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2022 May 18. Doi: 10.1515/ jbcpp-2022-0053. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35596255.
24.
Rajendran R, Sharma VK, Ananthakrishnan R, Kolar VV, Hanumanthappa N, Subramanian SK. Comparison of body composition using body mass index, body fat percentage (bioimpedance), waist circumference, hip circumference, and somatotyping across complete glycaemic spectrum. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2022;12(12):2120-25. [crossref]
25.
American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S62-S69. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560-72. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Garrow JS. Quetelet index as indicator of obesity. Lancet. 1986;1(8491):1219. Doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91207-9. PMID: 2871462. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Manuel Gomez J, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: Utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(6):1430-53. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of 560 low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative 561 ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499-502. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Aviv A. Chronology versus biology: Telomeres, essential hypertension, and vascular aging. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979). 2002;40(3):229-32. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Jeanclos E, Schork NJ, Kyvik KO, Kimura M, Skurnick JH, Aviv A. Telomere length inversely correlates with pulse pressure and is highly familial. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979). 2000;36(2):195-200. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Al-Attas OS, Al-Daghri NM, Alokail MS, Alfadda A, Bamakhramah A, Sabico S, et al. Adiposity and insulin resistance correlate with telomere length in middle-aged Arabs: The influence of circulating adiponectin. Euro J Endocrionol. 2010;163(4):601-07. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Karimi B, Yunesian M, Nabizadeh R, Mehdipour P. Serum level of total lipids and telomere length in the male population: A cross-sectional study. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2019;13(2):1557988319842973. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Mangge H, Herrmann M, Almer G, Zelzer S, Moeller R, Horejsi R, et al. Telomere shortening associates with elevated insulin and nuchal fat accumulation. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):6863. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Gardner JP, Li S, Srinivasan SR, Chen W, Kimura M, Lu X, et al. Rise in insulin resistance is associated with escalated telomere attrition. Circulation. 2005;111(17):2171-77. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Aulinas A, Ramírez MJ, Barahona MJ, Valassi E, Resmini E, Mato E, et al. Dyslipidemia and chronic inflammation markers are correlated with telomere length shortening in Cushing’s syndrome. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120185. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Kim JH, Ko JH, Lee DC, Lim I, Bang H. Habitual physical exercise has beneficial effects on telomere length in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2012;19(10):1109-15. Doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3182503e97. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Broer L, Raschenberger J, Deelen J, Mangino M, Codd V, Pietiläinen KH, et al. Association of adiponectin and leptin with relative telomere length in seven independent cohorts including 11,448 participants. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(9):629-38. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
Hartnell JM, Morley JE, Mooradian AD. Reduction of alkali-induced white blood cell DNA unwinding rate: A potential biomarker of aging. Journal of Gerontology. 1989;44(5):B125-30. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Morley JE, Mooradian AD, Rosenthal MJ, Kaiser FE. Diabetes mellitus in elderly patients. Is it different? Am J Med. 1987;83(3):533-44. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Serra V, von Zglinicki T, Lorenz M, Saretzki G. Extracellular superoxide dismutase is a major antioxidant in human fibroblasts and slows telomere shortening. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(9):6824-30. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
von Zglinicki T, Saretzki G, Docke W, Lotze C. Mild hyperoxia shortens telomeres and inhibits proliferation of fibroblasts: A model for senescence? Experimental Cell Research. 1995;220(1):186-93. [crossref][PubMed]
43.
Sitte N, Saretzki G, von Zglinicki T. Accelerated telomere shortening in fibroblasts after extended periods of confluency. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 1998;24(6):885-93. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Von Zglinicki T. Role of oxidative stress in telomere length regulation and replicative senescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;908:99-110. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Beery AK, Lin J, Biddle JS, Francis DD, Blackburn EH, Epel ES. Chronic stress elevates telomerase activity in rats. Biol Lett. 2012;8(6):1063-66. [crossref][PubMed]
46.
Damjanovic AK, Yang Y, Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Nguyen H, Laskowski B, et al. Accelerated telomere erosion is associated with a declining immune function of caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease patients. J Immnumol (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2007;179(6):4249-54. [crossref][PubMed]
47.
Mohamed A, Elbadawy A, Shawky M, Elhammady A, El-Assal M, Talaat A, et al. Telomerase activity in diabetic patients with angiopathy. Life Sci J. 2014;11.
48.
Baltzis D, Meimeti E, Grammatikopoulou MG, Roustit M, Mavrogonatou E, Kletsas D, et al. Assessment of telomerase activity in leukocytes of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients having or not foot ulcer: Possible correlation with other clinical parameters. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(4):3420-24. [crossref][PubMed]
49.
Wu K, Higashi N, Hansen ER, Lund M, Bang K, Thestrup-Pedersen K. Telomerase activity is increased and telomere length shortened in T cells from blood of patients with atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. J Immnuol (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2000;165(8):4742-47. [crossref][PubMed]
50.
Bozkus F, Guler S, Simsek S. Serum telomerase levels and COPD exacerbations. Respiratory Care. 2016;61(3):359. [crossref][PubMed]
52.
Stentz FB, Kitabchi AE. Hyperglycaemia-induced activation of human T-lymphocytes with de novo emergence of insulin receptors and generation of reactive oxygen species. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;335(2):491-95. [crossref][PubMed]
52.
Entringer S, Epel ES, Lin J, Buss C, Shahbaba B, Blackburn EH, et al. Maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy is associated with newborn leukocyte telomere length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(2):134.e1-7. [crossref][PubMed]
53.
Yi HS, Kim SY, Kim JT, Lee YS, Moon JS, Kim M, et al. T-cell senescence contributes to abnormal glucose homeostasis in humans and mice. Cell Death & Disease. 2019;103:249.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64107.18512

Date of Submission: Mar 15, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 06, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 04, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: JIPMER, Puducherry, for providing an intramural research grant, and
the Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India (RSSDI) for providing an extramural research grant.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 20, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 02, 2023 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com